
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV: The Failure of &#8220;Star Trek: Enterprise&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://closetscifigeek.com/2006/03/23/tv-the-failure-of-star-trek-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2006/03/23/tv-the-failure-of-star-trek-enterprise/</link>
	<description>science fiction news and reviews for closet nerds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: flexnfx</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2006/03/23/tv-the-failure-of-star-trek-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>flexnfx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=22#comment-24</guid>
		<description>So here&#039;s the deal...

What made the release of Star Trek TMP so exciting was the wait...

TNG was taken off the air and within 6 months we had Generations.  They really should have gone into a 2 year hiatus between the end of TNG and the film, but they didn&#039;t.

Enterprise wasn&#039;t all that bad, but to many liberties were taken not to stick with Trek chronology...the Klingons should have been made to look as they did in TOS.

This is my 2 cents for what it is worth.

www.flexfiles.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here&#8217;s the deal&#8230;</p>
<p>What made the release of Star Trek TMP so exciting was the wait&#8230;</p>
<p>TNG was taken off the air and within 6 months we had Generations.  They really should have gone into a 2 year hiatus between the end of TNG and the film, but they didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Enterprise wasn&#8217;t all that bad, but to many liberties were taken not to stick with Trek chronology&#8230;the Klingons should have been made to look as they did in TOS.</p>
<p>This is my 2 cents for what it is worth.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flexfiles.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.flexfiles.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2006/03/23/tv-the-failure-of-star-trek-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=22#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been saying that since Deep Space 9.

Star Trek is tired.  It needs a rest.

Just like Battlestar Galactica, they can put it away for some years and then revamp it to be interesting and exciting again.

But they didn&#039;t and they brought out Voyager (not bad, but still tired) and Enterprise (very tired).

They should have just let the Star Trek franchise just quietly fade away instead of getting canceled.

Of course, getting canceled is how the original series ended.  So I guess we have come full circle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been saying that since Deep Space 9.</p>
<p>Star Trek is tired.  It needs a rest.</p>
<p>Just like Battlestar Galactica, they can put it away for some years and then revamp it to be interesting and exciting again.</p>
<p>But they didn&#8217;t and they brought out Voyager (not bad, but still tired) and Enterprise (very tired).</p>
<p>They should have just let the Star Trek franchise just quietly fade away instead of getting canceled.</p>
<p>Of course, getting canceled is how the original series ended.  So I guess we have come full circle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

