
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Children of Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://closetscifigeek.com/2007/04/27/children-of-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2007/04/27/children-of-men/</link>
	<description>science fiction news and reviews for closet nerds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macauley Peterson</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2007/04/27/children-of-men/comment-page-1/#comment-24984</link>
		<dc:creator>Macauley Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/2007/04/27/children-of-men/#comment-24984</guid>
		<description>I like Equilibrium, but you can&#039;t possibly argue that its WRITING is better, can you?

I think you&#039;re selling Children of Men short if your main objection is with its premise. For Sci-Fi, it&#039;s hardly &quot;patently absurd.&quot; I mean c&#039;mon!

Sure, the ending isn&#039;t &quot;realistic&quot; but try viewing the whole thing in an allegorical light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Equilibrium, but you can&#8217;t possibly argue that its WRITING is better, can you?</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re selling Children of Men short if your main objection is with its premise. For Sci-Fi, it&#8217;s hardly &#8220;patently absurd.&#8221; I mean c&#8217;mon!</p>
<p>Sure, the ending isn&#8217;t &#8220;realistic&#8221; but try viewing the whole thing in an allegorical light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

