<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Star Trek Trailer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://closetscifigeek.com/2008/11/23/the-new-star-trek-trailer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2008/11/23/the-new-star-trek-trailer/</link>
	<description>science fiction news and reviews for cool nerds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:16:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: flexnfx</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2008/11/23/the-new-star-trek-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-77044</link>
		<dc:creator>flexnfx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=290#comment-77044</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m mixed about this...I like some of the retro touches...but I think Trek can go other places besides rehashing TOS...there&#039;s only one Captain Kirk IMO - The Shat!

www.flexfiles.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m mixed about this&#8230;I like some of the retro touches&#8230;but I think Trek can go other places besides rehashing TOS&#8230;there&#8217;s only one Captain Kirk IMO &#8211; The Shat!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flexfiles.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.flexfiles.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2008/11/23/the-new-star-trek-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-76455</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=290#comment-76455</guid>
		<description>While I only saw what I gather is the first trailer, I also have some mixed feelings. It does look like Star Wars with Star Trek ships. 

Hey, it wouldn&#039;t be Kirk if he didn&#039;t have a fling with some green chick or something, would it?I suspect if there is some of that, they will tone that down and try to make it more serious, like they did with Casino Royale. Honestly, JJ Abrams seems to want to give the original series a credible face, and I don&#039;t think that would invovle all that much gratuitious sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I only saw what I gather is the first trailer, I also have some mixed feelings. It does look like Star Wars with Star Trek ships. </p>
<p>Hey, it wouldn&#8217;t be Kirk if he didn&#8217;t have a fling with some green chick or something, would it?I suspect if there is some of that, they will tone that down and try to make it more serious, like they did with Casino Royale. Honestly, JJ Abrams seems to want to give the original series a credible face, and I don&#8217;t think that would invovle all that much gratuitious sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB-742</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2008/11/23/the-new-star-trek-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-76370</link>
		<dc:creator>DB-742</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=290#comment-76370</guid>
		<description>I agree...i&#039;m invigorated by the energy of the trailer but also apprehensive that its trying to hard to emolate star wars or battlestar galactica in its desire to make 90210 in space (lookit us moody twenty-somethings try get along!). I know &amp; understand that any star trek series always got a kick in the rating pants with scientific hotties but lets leave the gratuitous booty-call dogs of the 60&#039;s lie--after all wasn&#039;t Star Trek groundbreaking because Roddenberry believed prejudice, sexism &amp; racism would become a hopeless anachronism of the future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230;i&#8217;m invigorated by the energy of the trailer but also apprehensive that its trying to hard to emolate star wars or battlestar galactica in its desire to make 90210 in space (lookit us moody twenty-somethings try get along!). I know &amp; understand that any star trek series always got a kick in the rating pants with scientific hotties but lets leave the gratuitous booty-call dogs of the 60&#8217;s lie&#8211;after all wasn&#8217;t Star Trek groundbreaking because Roddenberry believed prejudice, sexism &amp; racism would become a hopeless anachronism of the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
