<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, My Mom Loved the New Star Trek Movie&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/05/30/well-my-mom-loved-the-new-star-trek-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/05/30/well-my-mom-loved-the-new-star-trek-movie/</link>
	<description>science fiction news and reviews for closet nerds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris McQuillan</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/05/30/well-my-mom-loved-the-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-127157</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris McQuillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=323#comment-127157</guid>
		<description>It was a great, fun ride - exactly what Star Trek often should be.

It may not have had the heavy-handed morality lesson, and that&#039;s not a bad thing for the opening movie.  The franchise is established.

I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see more morality appear in later movies in the series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a great, fun ride &#8211; exactly what Star Trek often should be.</p>
<p>It may not have had the heavy-handed morality lesson, and that&#8217;s not a bad thing for the opening movie.  The franchise is established.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see more morality appear in later movies in the series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/05/30/well-my-mom-loved-the-new-star-trek-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-119712</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=323#comment-119712</guid>
		<description>Well as I have been reading some of the letters and blogs, and as any of you that have seen my letters on so many web sights know I did not like this film. As I’ve been called I have to admit there is some proof to the fact that I’m an old die hard STICK IN THE MUD fan of Star Trek. The biggest problem I’ve got with the film is that it completely goes against Star Trek canon. As some people agree with me, some do not. So I think we both can come up with a solution that will appease both new fans of this film and us die hard STICK IN THE MUDS. We die hards cant do it alone so we need you new fans help and the best part about it is any of you that don’t know anything about Star Trek shouldn’t notice a thing anyway.
 I purpose introducing characters that are not considered canon but are still known to us old STICK IN THE MUDS. As well as some we didn’t get to know real well and for those of you that don’t know what I mean here some names to help you out. 

ROBERT APRIL he was suppose to be the Enterprises first Captain before Pike and was the only character ever played by Gene Rodenberry himself

AREX he was a navigator in the animated Star Trek and had six limbs. With new C.G.I. he could be created vary easily

WILL DECKER he was killed in the first movie but was suppose to be in the second T.V. show witch never happened.

ILIA also killed in the first movie

M’RESS also from the animated Star Trek she was of a cat like race easy to create now

I feel a letter writing campaign would help with this and then maybe you new fan and us old STICK IN THE MUDS can both enjoy the ride the next film takes us on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as I have been reading some of the letters and blogs, and as any of you that have seen my letters on so many web sights know I did not like this film. As I’ve been called I have to admit there is some proof to the fact that I’m an old die hard STICK IN THE MUD fan of Star Trek. The biggest problem I’ve got with the film is that it completely goes against Star Trek canon. As some people agree with me, some do not. So I think we both can come up with a solution that will appease both new fans of this film and us die hard STICK IN THE MUDS. We die hards cant do it alone so we need you new fans help and the best part about it is any of you that don’t know anything about Star Trek shouldn’t notice a thing anyway.<br />
 I purpose introducing characters that are not considered canon but are still known to us old STICK IN THE MUDS. As well as some we didn’t get to know real well and for those of you that don’t know what I mean here some names to help you out. </p>
<p>ROBERT APRIL he was suppose to be the Enterprises first Captain before Pike and was the only character ever played by Gene Rodenberry himself</p>
<p>AREX he was a navigator in the animated Star Trek and had six limbs. With new C.G.I. he could be created vary easily</p>
<p>WILL DECKER he was killed in the first movie but was suppose to be in the second T.V. show witch never happened.</p>
<p>ILIA also killed in the first movie</p>
<p>M’RESS also from the animated Star Trek she was of a cat like race easy to create now</p>
<p>I feel a letter writing campaign would help with this and then maybe you new fan and us old STICK IN THE MUDS can both enjoy the ride the next film takes us on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

