<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Closet Sci-Fi Geek &#187; stephanie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://closetscifigeek.com/author/stephanie-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://closetscifigeek.com</link>
	<description>science fiction news and reviews for closet nerds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should Harrison Ford Be in the Next Blade Runner?</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2011/08/19/should-harrison-ford-be-in-the-next-blade-runner/</link>
		<comments>http://closetscifigeek.com/2011/08/19/should-harrison-ford-be-in-the-next-blade-runner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blade Runner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the new Blade Runner movie being all the buzz, the big question is: Should Harrison Ford be in it? Even though he&#8217;s old and past his prime, Harrison Ford still has a tremendous amount of charisma and charm. I think I can speak for most ladies by saying, yes, he should be in it, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.deadline.com/2011/08/ridley-scott-ready-to-direct-new-version-of-seminal-sci-fi-film-blade-runner/" target="_blank">With the new Blade Runner movie being all the buzz</a>, the big question is: Should Harrison Ford be in it? Even though he&#8217;s old and past his prime, Harrison Ford still has a tremendous amount of charisma and charm. I think I can speak for most ladies by saying, yes, he should be in it, at least as a supporting character. I just hope this sequel/prequel isn&#8217;t as embarrassing as the last Indiana Jones movie was. You know, I actually enjoyed that Indiana Jones movie despite it being pretty bad in many ways, but let&#8217;s not sully the mystique of Blade Runner with a cheesy follow-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closetscifigeek.com/2011/08/19/should-harrison-ford-be-in-the-next-blade-runner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stargate Universe &#8211; The Final Verdict</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2011/07/11/stargate-universe-the-final-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://closetscifigeek.com/2011/07/11/stargate-universe-the-final-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stargate Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never watched Stargate SG-1 regularly; it was almost too bubble gum for me and I enjoyed the darker Farscape. But I thought I&#8217;d give Stargate Universe a try &#8211; seeing as we are short on good outer space shows lately. But SGU went too far in the opposite direction of bubble gum &#8211; it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-377" title="stargate_unverse" src="http://closetscifigeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/stargate_unverse_320-300x157.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="157" />I never watched Stargate SG-1 regularly; it was almost <em>too</em> bubble gum for me and I enjoyed the darker Farscape. But I thought I&#8217;d give Stargate Universe a try &#8211; seeing as we are short on good outer space shows lately. But SGU went too far in the opposite direction of bubble gum &#8211; it was dark, dreary, and depressing. It was trying to take its cue from the Battlestar Galactica remake but failed miserably out the gate.</p>
<p>Instead of being sharp and gripping, SGU (especially in season 1) was a dismal outer space soap opera that relied too heavily on characters returning to earth via the communication stones. While SGU perhaps thought it was being edgy by showcasing a lesbian relationship on the show, the relationship itself was dull, boring and didn&#8217;t advance the plot whatsoever. Who cares about the strains of being in outer space on a long-distance lesbian relationship? We want to see some action! If we cared that much more about characters&#8217; love lives then we&#8217;d be watching Desperate Housewives and not science fiction &#8211; and the writers forgot that.</p>
<p>Fortunately, the worst excesses of the relationship drama were weeded out by season 2. So the question is:</p>
<p><strong>Did SGU redeem itself? If you haven&#8217;t watched it yet, is it worth it to sit through season 1 to get to the improved season 2?</strong></p>
<p>Yes and no. Yes, in that, if you&#8217;ve watched all of Star Trek, all the Star Wars films, Firefly, Farscape, BSG, and every other conceivable space show out there, then by all means, you&#8217;ll want to rent SGU and watch it. It&#8217;s got some good points. I&#8217;d recommend, if you are really hating the relationship drama in season 1, to simply fast forward past it. Trust me, you aren&#8217;t missing anything.</p>
<p>By season 2, SGU started to gel a little bit and the writers added some much needed comic relief to the dreary landscape. By the end of season 2, the show had started to get its legs. Despite that, it was still a highly flawed series and suffered from a variety of problems, including (in no particular order):</p>
<p>1. Too much death and disappointment. Yes, it&#8217;s realistic, but in today&#8217;s &#8220;Great Recession&#8221; we need more hope and vision than that. I got tired of people dying, getting sick, or otherwise ending up deflated and disappointed.</p>
<p>2. Too much in-fighting, not enough camaraderie. We get it, Rush is an asshole, and the Colonel doesn&#8217;t like him. Next!</p>
<p>3. Wooden female characters. Camille Ray (the aforementioned lesbian) was the absolute worst and bypassed Chloe as my most hated female character. The female medic was only somewhat appealing. The best female characters were peripheral ones who outshone the main performers in their brief appearances on the show.</p>
<p>4. Big gaping plot holes or unresolved issues. (SPOILERS: Eli&#8217;s and Rush&#8217;s electronic girlfriends being put into quarantine with nary a mention or sniffle afterwards; the descendants of the alternate Destiny being dumped on a planet without us getting to see this, never mind that they were traveling in a hostile universe filled with psychopathic drones bent on destruction.)</p>
<p>5. Lack of a common goal. Rush wanted to find out what the message was from the edge of the universe, and everyone else wanted to get home. Or did they? No-one seemed to be motivated or excited about anything. Such a far cry from the optimism and vision of Star Trek.</p>
<p>There were a few things I liked about SGU: I actually liked Eli, as well as Rush, and Greer was probably my favorite character. The two science geeks on the bridge ended up being quite funny and they added much in season 2. I only wish they&#8217;d done more with the alien Chloe.</p>
<p>The bottom line for me is that SGU was an extremely flawed show that might have gotten a bit better if given a little more time. But in this instance, I don&#8217;t blame SyFy for dumping it, as much as I hate SyFy&#8217;s lack of loyalty to its shows and its fans. All that said, in two seasons of SGU, there were many decent moments and interesting things going on. If you&#8217;re jonesin&#8217; for some outer space scifi then SGU might not be a bad thing to catch up on. Just don&#8217;t have high expectations for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closetscifigeek.com/2011/07/11/stargate-universe-the-final-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old V vs. New V</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/11/10/old-v-vs-new-v/</link>
		<comments>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/11/10/old-v-vs-new-v/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1980s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retro Sci-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/11/10/old-v-vs-new-v/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m aging myself here, but I remember when the original V miniseries aired back in 1983. I was about 13 years old at the time. V was a huge deal for us young teens – everyone seemed to be talking about it. Some 25 years later, I still remember the main characters from V: The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m aging myself here, but I remember when the original V miniseries aired back in 1983. I was about 13 years old at the time. V was a huge deal for us young teens – everyone seemed to be talking about it. </p>
<p>Some 25 years later, I still remember the main characters from V: The nice, shy, sweet alien (played by Freddy Krueger of <em>Nightmare on Elm Street</em>). The beautiful but evil Diana. And our main hero, the adventurous cameraman. The miniseries spawned a second miniseries and then a one-season TV show, but for its brief lifespan it sure had an impact.</p>
<p>I recently watched the original V miniseries again and also the new ABC version of V, which premiered as a one-hour television episode. I was surprised at how well the old V held up, though the new V is also quite promising.</p>
<p><strong>Old V</strong></p>
<p>The old V does look dated now (if just that everyone watching news of the aliens is doing so on old console TV sets), but it is still a very compelling story. The basic plot is that aliens (the “Visitors”) land on earth, promising peace and harmony, but they are hiding a sinister plot instead.</p>
<p>The original V, dedicated to “resistance fighters,” shows parallels between the transition to martial law under the Visitors and Nazi Germany. Scientists are the Jews in the original V, and we are shown scenes of families hiding out and being persecuted as scapegoats as the Visitors use a concocted plot to clamp down on American freedoms.</p>
<p>The original V, despite being born of a more innocent age on television, does a surprisingly good job at showing the differing reactions and motivations of people living under the new regime. Some help others, while others turn their neighbors in to the “authorities” due to ego and a lust for power.</p>
<p>The special effects of the original V are actually surprisingly good for 1983; while the spaceships are a little clunky, the flying scenes are decent, and I actually kind of miss those obvious blue laser beams used in old sci-fi.</p>
<p>One thing we loved as kids when the original V came out were the alien voices. The strange reverberation is a neat effect to this day. As a 13-year-old in the 80s, this was seen as pretty darn “cool.”</p>
<p>(SPOILERS!) The original V also had some great reveals missing in the new version. The alien Diana eating a live mouse and guinea pig was probably one of the most shocking and surprising things ever shown on TV. And who can forget the alien hybrid baby that came about later? </p>
<p><strong>New V</strong></p>
<p>Of course, one of the main things that gets updated with a redo of an old sci-fi show is the special effects. The new V, of course, benefits from the enhanced special effects of our day, but these still would mean nothing without decent characters and plot. Special effects done for their own sake can get tired. Fortunately, the special effects in the new V are used to good effect. The visual of the alien commander Anna giving her initial greeting to the world through a big screen created on the bottom of each spaceship was exceptionally memorable.</p>
<p>It was also quite dramatic to show the city undergoing an earthquake as the large mothership descended.</p>
<p>As for the plot, so far, the new V keeps the general theme of the old, with some new twists.</p>
<p>The new V, for example, does not hit you over the head over parallels between the Visitors and Nazi Germany in the way the old V did (at least so far). Instead, the Visitors are greeted with a hysteria that some journalists have compared with the Obamamania that hit the nation in 2008. I personally did not see the first episode of V personally attacking Obama per se (except for one obvious “HOPE” sign). Still, you could find some vague parallels to the Obama craze with the selling of V t-shirts and merchandise. The show seems to caution against getting too enthralled before all the facts are known. But the parallels with Obama end there.</p>
<p>My feeling is this: It’s not that the show was trying to say that Obama was like the Visitors; rather, I think the show was trying to say: Look at what might happen should blind devotion be given without critical thought. </p>
<p>The biggest threat, we are told, is that the Visitors have a powerful weapon…”devotion.” So it looks like we’ll be seeing more exploration of the idea of “celebrity hype” and the Visitors.</p>
<p>(Perhaps we are lucky Obama isn’t secretly a reptile &#8211; though David Icke and other conspiracy theorists might dispute that!)</p>
<p>As for the Visitors themselves, they are updated from the original in that they are sleeker and better dressed. The old red uniforms, hats and cheesy sunglasses are out: Fashion-forward beige dress suits are in.</p>
<p>The alien commander, “Anna,” is a beautiful woman with a trendy pixie haircut. Diana’s big 80’s hair is out.</p>
<p>They are still lizards underneath the human-looking skin, but instead of showing us rigid masks underneath the fake skin, we just get to see glimpses of reptile in a more subtle fashion. Sometimes less is more.</p>
<p>As for our dear alien leader: The casting of Anna was perfect. She manages to give the creepiest smiles in her role as Supreme Stepford Wife.</p>
<p>As for the plot itself: Instead of the aliens going after scientists as in the original, we have aliens acting as terrorists who are infiltrating all aspects of American life and government. A counter-insurgency group is the only resistance at this point. This is a sophisticated and modern update of the original V story. I find both versions interesting.</p>
<p>I would say the only thing that I missed about the old V in the new V was the lovely pacing. The old V took a bit of time to do its revealing – of course, that was due in part to the mini-series format. The new V hit us over the head in a single episode with the whole shebang: “Here are the Visitors. They are promising peace. Whoops, they are actually evil reptiles. Surprise!”</p>
<p>So the new V has a little less mystery than the old V…but that’s OK. It seems to be starting off in a good direction.</p>
<p>If I have one minor gripe it’s that they flipped the use of the spraypainted Vs in the new version. In the old version the “V” spraypaint was a sign of the resistance – it meant “Victory.” In the new V, the “V” stands for the Visitors, and for some reason they are encouraging their followers to “tag” with it. Kind of silly, really.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I think the new V looks really promising. </p>
<p>P.S. Doesn’t Joel Gretsch (the priest from the new V) look like the long lost brother of Marc Singer (the cameraman of the old V)? Maybe that’s just me. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/11/10/old-v-vs-new-v/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stargate Universe Turning Into Horrible Space Opera</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/11/09/stargate-universe-turning-into-space-opera/</link>
		<comments>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/11/09/stargate-universe-turning-into-space-opera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stargate Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Stargate Universe, you are losing me. I initially gave SGU a good review. The first episode was very promising. Seven episodes later, the show is failing to live up to its initial promise. We&#8217;re treated to the &#8220;Big Problem of the Week&#8221; instead of the &#8220;Big Adventure of the Week.&#8221; More and more, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Stargate Universe, you are losing me.</p>
<p>I initially gave SGU a good review. The first episode was very promising.</p>
<p>Seven episodes later, the show is failing to live up to its initial promise.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re treated to the &#8220;Big Problem of the Week&#8221; instead of the &#8220;Big Adventure of the Week.&#8221; More and more, the focus of the show is on the lame sex lives of the characters, instead of science fiction.</p>
<p>An excessive focus of the show has been the love life of Chloe, who is probably the weakest, least interesting, and most annoying character on SGU. (In fact, I&#8217;d make her one of the worst characters I&#8217;ve seen on TV in a while).</p>
<p>In the most recent episode of SGU, we were treated to an extensive trip into a nightclub, where we got to see Chloe (trading consciousness with someone on earth), get upset at her best friend for now dating her ex-boyfriend. Meanwhile, Chloe is sleeping with a young soldier on the ship &#8211; so why should she care? It&#8217;s not like she&#8217;s being loyal to said boyfriend. Meanwhile, Eli is in love with her.</p>
<p>THIS IS NOT SCI-FI! I do not care about Chloe and her stupid love life!</p>
<p>Chloe is a good example of how useless most characters are made on SGU. Chloe is there because she&#8217;s a senator&#8217;s daughter. She does not offer anything of value to the efforts to save the people on Destiny, yet she&#8217;s regularly given special perks due to her political status. She has yet to display any bravery, intelligence, creativity, or anything else useful (other than talking back to Rush in one brief instant).</p>
<p>Among the women on Destiny: We have a boring human resources manager, a boring blonde medic, and that&#8217;s about it. The male characters are slightly better but not one of them has any lasting charisma to make the show inspiring. Eli is a character I do like, but he irritates half the audience, and Rush is probably the only thing saving this show.</p>
<p>If the writers at SGU don&#8217;t get it together soon, this show is going to go down in history as one of the worst, most mind-numbingly painful sci-fi shows ever. And that&#8217;s a lot for me to say, considering how much I liked the first episode.</p>
<p>Get it together, SGU people. You can start by diminishing Chloe&#8217;s role and finding some other more interesting female to bring to the forefront, someone who has more dramatic interest other than the fact that she sleeps around a lot and confuses cheap sex with love. </p>
<p>I am giving SGU about one or two more episodes. If they continue the obsessive focus on Chloe&#8217;s personal life rather than science fiction, I am done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/11/09/stargate-universe-turning-into-space-opera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stargate Universe a Welcome Evolution of the Brand</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/10/12/stargate-universe-a-welcome-evolution-of-the-brand/</link>
		<comments>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/10/12/stargate-universe-a-welcome-evolution-of-the-brand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stargate Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some are calling Stargate Universe a cross between the latest Battlestar Galactica and Lost. While I don&#8217;t see how this new Stargate series relates much to Lost, I do see some BSG influences in the grittier, darker SGU. I was never drawn in to watch Stargate: SG1 on a regular basis. It was one of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-345" title="Stargate Universe" src="http://closetscifigeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/stargate-universe-sdcc-poster-300x203.jpg" alt="Stargate Universe" width="300" height="203" />Some are calling Stargate Universe a cross between the latest Battlestar Galactica and Lost. While I don&#8217;t see how this new Stargate series relates much to Lost, I do see some BSG influences in the grittier, darker SGU.</p>
<p>I was never drawn in to watch Stargate: SG1 on a regular basis. It was one of those shows I would watch once in a while when I happened to catch it. I was a Farscape fan, and SG1 really didn&#8217;t cut the mustard compared to Farscape. Bringing on Ben Browder and Claudia Black did not convert me to SG1 &#8211; it actually kept me away. Why ruin my good Farscape memories just to see Ben and Claudia in an inferior show?</p>
<p>I caught Stargate Atlantis a few times and found it entertaining, but not so much that I wanted to include it on my regular TV schedule. It was always one of those &#8220;well, I&#8217;ll watch this series at some point on DVD when nothing else is good on TV&#8221; type of shows.</p>
<p>So I wasn&#8217;t waiting for the premiere of Stargate Universe with baited breath. Since the SciFi channel turned into the watered down SyFy I haven&#8217;t really paid much attention. But I just happened to see SGU was available on Hulu and decided to give it a go.</p>
<p>Not being attached to the previous Stargate shows, I was able to watch SGU with fresh eyes. I liked that it was a little less shiny and plastic than previous Stargate incarnations. The quality of the filming seemed to be more cinematic. (Notably, some of the desert cinematography was particularly well-done for a TV show in the last installment of the opener.)</p>
<p>While some of the plot elements were a little canned (such as &#8211; SPOILER ALERT &#8211; the ridiculous sacrifice on behalf of the politician with his daughter stupidly freaking out and trying to stop what obviously could not be stopped), I liked the idea of a group of refugees being stuck on a mysterious ship way out in the middle of nowhere.</p>
<p>The characters on SGU are a mixed bag. Geeky Eli who is a fish out of water is my favorite (loved his comments on the desert planet about finding a half-buried Statue of Liberty). The military guys are pretty good, and the amoral scientist with the requisite accent is also an intriguing character. The women I am not so fond of. Chloe, the daughter of a senator, is whiny, moody, and very unappealing personality-wise. She&#8217;s not even that attractive so I have to wonder why on earth she was cast. (As I noted on <a href="http://twitter.com/closetscifigeek" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, there seems to be this bizarre trend lately towards girls with really huge foreheads.) We also have a female medic who one Internet fan called a &#8220;7 of 9&#8243; clone, and Ming Na, who has not really done much so far, so I can&#8217;t really judge.</p>
<p>If I have one minor nitpick, I hate the fact that when they use their &#8220;communication stones&#8221; to talk to people on earth, they make it look like the people have switched bodies when they haven&#8217;t. I understand this is a device to make the audience understand a new personality is taking over the body on earth, but it would make a lot more sense to me if the actors simply mimicked being the character that is inhabiting the body. It really takes me out of the story when they use a device like that. (Kind of like the silly body switch they&#8217;ve been doing lately on Ghost Whisperer.)</p>
<p>Stargate Universe does have problems sometimes with pacing &#8211; the show can drag a bit at times, and it has yet to find a good rhythm and rapport with all the diverse characters. I am intrigued, however, and Hulu gives me an easy way to watch the show at my convenience. So I&#8217;ll be tuning in for more&#8230;for as long as SyFy keeps the show alive.</p>
<p>Now if SyFy would get it together and actually offer a Farscape spin-off&#8230;ahhh, a girl can dream&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/10/12/stargate-universe-a-welcome-evolution-of-the-brand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voltron on Hulu</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/09/06/voltron-on-hulu/</link>
		<comments>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/09/06/voltron-on-hulu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1980s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retro Sci-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voltron]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, you know you&#8217;re getting old when cartoons you used to watch as a teen are now considered &#8220;retro cartoons.&#8221; Damn! Am I really middle aged already? I don&#8217;t feel it&#8230;and hopefully don&#8217;t look it! But we can still be thankful to Hulu for releasing Voltron for streaming on its site. Now, I&#8217;m not a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, you know you&#8217;re getting old when cartoons you used to watch as a teen are now considered &#8220;retro cartoons.&#8221; Damn! Am I really middle aged already? I don&#8217;t feel it&#8230;and hopefully don&#8217;t look it! But we can still be thankful to Hulu for releasing Voltron for streaming on its site. Now, I&#8217;m not a fanboy, but I loved those anime cartoons when I was a girl&#8230;I didn&#8217;t know at the time that they were meant for such a thing as &#8220;fanboys.&#8221; I just thought they were cartoons. I very much enjoyed Voltron, though I think Thundercats was more my favorite, if just that I wanted to grow up and become Cheetara.</p>
<p>Voltron was probably the first thing I watched that introduced me to the concept of the giant robot. I wasn&#8217;t so much into the Transformers but Voltron I dug. I&#8217;m not sure why&#8230;maybe it was the way the lions roared when Voltron swung his mighty fists out.</p>
<p>At any rate, you can enjoy Voltron episodes, in order, on Hulu, for free. And when you are done, watch He-Man and She-Ra. Yeah!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the first episode of Voltron&#8230;which, ironically, doesn&#8217;t actually include a real appearance by the big bot:</p>
<p><object width="512" height="296"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/EoCdIfOA4AcGgJ4jtO159w"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/EoCdIfOA4AcGgJ4jtO159w" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true"  width="512" height="296"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/09/06/voltron-on-hulu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warehouse 13 Steampunk TV</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/08/16/warehouse-13-steampunk-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/08/16/warehouse-13-steampunk-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek Voyager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steampunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warehouse 13]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It took my mother (my own mother!) to get me to give Warehouse 13 a try (I&#8217;d pretty much given up on cheesily renamed SyFy). But Mom can be surprising &#8211; she liked the new Star Trek, and she loves Warehouse 13. This is after having absolutely no interest in science fiction her entire life. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-335" title="Warehouse 13" src="http://closetscifigeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/warehouse13-300x232.jpg" alt="Warehouse 13" width="300" height="232" />It took my mother (my own mother!) to get me to give Warehouse 13 a try (I&#8217;d pretty much given up on cheesily renamed SyFy). But Mom can be surprising &#8211; she liked the new Star Trek, and she loves Warehouse 13. This is after having absolutely no interest in science fiction her entire life. I guess that&#8217;s proof enough that scifi has really gone mainstream.</p>
<p>I finally got caught up on Warehouse 13 via the magic of <a href="http://www.hulu.com" target="_blank">Hulu</a>. (Side note to Hulu and TV execs: Why not leave all the episodes and seasons up there?) After seeing the first episode, I was pleasantly surprised. After all, Warehouse 13 is not an original premise by any stretch of the imagination. We have:</p>
<p>1. A warehouse taken from Indiana Jones.<br />
2. The &#8220;collect the cursed object&#8221; theme, ala Friday the 13th: The Series (which I&#8217;d love to rewatch at some point, actually).<br />
3. Secret agents Mully and Sculder in comedy format, who are actually more reminiscent of&#8230;<br />
4. Bones&#8230;with a lead guy who actually looks like David Boreanaz&#8217;s brother.<br />
5. Somewhat insane gruff, anti-social scientist ala Fringe.</p>
<p>The show manages to pull all these already done ideas together in a way that is surprisingly fresh and entertaining. A few things make this work: First, the casting is excellent. The characters are likeable and the rapport between the main characters terrific. But more than that, we have the Warehouse and its fun steampunk gadgets.</p>
<p>&#8220;Steampunk&#8221; is a term I&#8217;ve only heard recently via discussions of Warehouse 13. It refers to a combination of modern technology and retro styling, with a heavy emphasis on an ornate Victorian feel.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always loved steampunk without knowing exactly what it was. The first steampunk movie that got my notice was Brazil (from way back in the 80s) with its strangely retro but cyberpunk typewriters and futuristic regression. I just loved the gadgets in Brazil &#8211; it was part of what made the movie a classic for me.</p>
<p>Anyone remember The Secret Adventures of Jules Verne? This was a steampunk fantasy show that was on SciFi back in 2000. It included a dirigible and all sorts of anachronistic, futuristic gadgets. (It&#8217;s a shame that show went bye-bye&#8230;I would love to see it again!)</p>
<p>Even Farscape, I felt, had a slightly steampunk feel to it&#8230;not that the gadgets were Victorian or overly ornate, but we had gotten away from that sterile cold look that had dominated the new Star Trek shows. The videophone on Farscape was a golden clamshell, and all the instruments on Moya were a rusty copper instead of the slick modern look of Voyager.</p>
<p>I also loved Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow&#8230;more Art Deco steampunk than Victorian&#8230;but a delicious visual feast. And the Golden Compass was similarly underrated &#8211; the design in that film was absolutely beautiful!</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-339" title="Clauda Steampunk" src="http://closetscifigeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/warehouse9.jpg" alt="Clauda Steampunk" width="300" height="199" />So Warehouse 13 brings us a show that would mostly be mind candy were it not for its scrumptious steampunk aesthetic. The secret agents do have cellphones, but they are more likely to use a two-way video phone that was made in the 1920s. Artie, the mad scientist of the lot, types away at a Victorian-style keyboard. (This keyboard was designed by a steampunk artist called <a href="http://www.datamancer.net" target="_blank">Datamancer</a> who sells custom-built computers and accessories in lush steampunk style.) The gun of choice for our heroes is a retro raygun built by Tesla (who is often brought into steampunk-inspired fantasies&#8230;if you recall, he played a big part in the film The Prestige).</p>
<p>Warehouse 13 also demonstrates some knowledge of the steampunk fashion currently hitting the underground by donning young Claudia, computer genius, with her own pair of steampunk goggles. (I wasn&#8217;t sure if I was too crazy about Claudia at first, but I do feel she&#8217;s a better foil for Artie than boring Aura Girl.)</p>
<p>Of course, a few steampunk gadgets will not keep the show afloat on its own. While I do feel a lot of the show&#8217;s plots are a bit banal and could have easily been written for Friday the 13th, the saving grace here is that Warehouse 13 is simply enjoyable. A lot of that has to do with the humor, and both the leads have an excellent delivery that sets this show apart from the much drearier Fringe.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see how the show evolves&#8230;and if SyFy will keep it around for more than their usual 13 episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/08/16/warehouse-13-steampunk-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ghostbusters!</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/08/16/ghostbusters/</link>
		<comments>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/08/16/ghostbusters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1980s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy/Satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retro Sci-Fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just watched Ghostbusters on YouTube &#8211; the full-length movie is available for free, with the minor annoyance of a few brief ads cutting through actual sentences here and there. I love this movie. Right from the start, with the librarian dealing with a ghost who likes toying with books and card catalogs, it&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched Ghostbusters on YouTube &#8211; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22hUHCr-Tos" target="_blank">the full-length movie is available for free</a>, with the minor annoyance of a few brief ads cutting through actual sentences here and there.</p>
<p>I love this movie. Right from the start, with the librarian dealing with a ghost who likes toying with books and card catalogs, it&#8217;s a ton of fun. I remember when I first saw it and the Stay Puft Marshallow Man appeared. I was laughing so hard, I was crying. The 80s was such a great decade for big, fun movies.</p>
<p>I guess there&#8217;s a Ghostbusters III in the works, scheduled for 2012&#8230;.just in time for the end of the world per the Mayan Calendar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/08/16/ghostbusters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Well, My Mom Loved the New Star Trek Movie&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/05/30/well-my-mom-loved-the-new-star-trek-movie/</link>
		<comments>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/05/30/well-my-mom-loved-the-new-star-trek-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am visiting my mom and she suggested that we go check out Star Trek at the theater &#8211; much to my shock, since she&#8217;s never been into sci-fi. I hadn&#8217;t gotten around to seeing it yet so I was very pleased that mom wanted to go. She loved it! She found it to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-324" title="New Spock and Kirk" src="http://closetscifigeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/star-trek-review-300x168.jpg" alt="New Spock and Kirk" width="300" height="168" />I am visiting my mom and she suggested that we go check out Star Trek at the theater &#8211; much to my shock, since she&#8217;s never been into sci-fi. I hadn&#8217;t gotten around to seeing it yet so I was very pleased that mom wanted to go. She loved it! She found it to be very entertaining and had a great time. A female friend of mine who is also not into sci-fi at all also just recommended the new Star Trek movie on Facebook.</p>
<p>And that, I think, is the greatest strength of this new Trek &#8211; it brings in people who are not sci-fi fans, particularly women, it seems. So on that front, this movie is a huge success.</p>
<p>Obviously, if you are a real Trek fan, you&#8217;ll know that quite a few Trekkers/Trekkies are seriously pissed off about it. Rebooting the entire Trek universe, and wiping out 40 years of Canon? Spock and Uhuru? Vulcan gone? Whaaaat???</p>
<p>I went into the movie totally fresh, having avoided reading any reviews of it until I&#8217;d seen it. I had no idea it was a reboot. I was sitting there scratching my head as to why Chekov was already onboard the Enterprise when finally the plot revealed that this was an alternative timeline. (I&#8217;m not so up on Trek Canon that I remembered whether Kirk&#8217;s father was alive or not.)</p>
<p>I totally expected everything to &#8220;reset&#8221; back to normal at the end of the film, and I was blown away when they didn&#8217;t. (This surprised my mom too!) But actually, I&#8217;d say that was one of the better aspects of the film. Having seen the Standard Star Trek Timeline Reset Plot waaaaayyyy too many times at this point (especially on Voyager), I was glad someone finally had the balls to keep things screwed up and different.</p>
<p>My mom and I have decided this &#8220;reboot&#8221; is not actually wiping out all the stuff that happened to the &#8220;original&#8221; Kirk and crew, but it is rather an alternative or parallel universe that the old Spock is now stuck in. Otherwise, had the original universe been wiped clean, old Spock would have disappeared as in Back to the Future. (As my mom explained, the old timeline still has to exist for the old Spock to continue existing, it is only &#8220;logical,&#8221; and since he is a Vulcan, it has to be based on logic! You go, Mom!)</p>
<p>Given that I&#8217;m willing to accept that this new Trek does not in any way negate Original Trek, I&#8217;m a bit more forgiving than some Trek fans over this new timeline and the events thereof (including the Spock and Uhuru thing, which will either be annoying or interesting in future sequels).</p>
<p>So putting that big huge issue aside, here&#8217;s my take on the rest of the film:</p>
<p>Loved the casting for the new Kirk and Spock &#8211; both were fantastic, and cute I might add so good eye candy for the ladies.</p>
<p>New McCoy kicked ass, but I wished he had some better lines in parts.</p>
<p>I liked the new Scottie, though some complained he was too silly&#8230;I still liked him. I was just confused as to how he got immediately promoted to Chief Engineer once arriving on the Enterprise. Where&#8217;d the original one go?</p>
<p>New Sulu was OK&#8230;they didn&#8217;t give him much to work with so I can&#8217;t really judge. I did love his unfolding sword though. More of that, please!</p>
<p>New Chekov&#8230;umm&#8230;yeah, not my favorite. Chekov was supposed to be the young hottie for the girls watching the orignal Star Trek, modeled after the Beatles and the Monkees. This new Chekov looked like he had been living in a cave all his life and had never seen sunlight. Unappealing.</p>
<p>New Uhuru: Pretty, but not bringing the presence that Nichelle Nichols had.</p>
<p>Plotwise, the writing was pretty poor, especially for a J.J. Abrams project, who has been so meticulous with Lost that I expect much more from him. But the action was definitely entertaining and the pace was quick, so you didn&#8217;t have time while watching to ponder the numerous inconsistencies and ridiculous events (such as Kirk getting dumped off at the very planet Old Spock was on). Watching all the machinations they went through to get all the characters together was downright painful at times.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I was entertained and enjoyed it, and felt it was certainly better than some of the worse Next Generation films. (What about that awful one where they go to the planet with eternal life? That was certainly underwhelming.)</p>
<p>The brightest spot for me was the appearance of Leonard Nimoy as Old Spock. Once he started speaking, I was reminded how <em>good</em> the original cast was. Nimoy brought so much to the screen with his performance, even at his advanced age. As good as the young Spock was, he was definitely served by Nimoy.</p>
<p>Overall, I give this film at B+ &#8211; to me it&#8217;s not the worst Trek movie ever but it&#8217;s definitely no Wrath of Khan.</p>
<p>I think that future installments (as I&#8217;m sure there will be) will actually be much better. We won&#8217;t have to deal with the awkward introductions and whatnot to get the crew together. We&#8217;ll just have our new Kirk at the helm, galavanting around the galaxy with his intense blue eyes (loved those blue eyes &#8211; sorry Shatner).</p>
<p>Not really true Trek, but honestly? They could have done a lot worse. I remember how upset I was when Next Generation came out. I originally hated that with a passion. This is a million times better than that first Next Generation episode, so perhaps they&#8217;ll improve with the next film and we can start over again with this being the ODD number of the new Trek movies, and number two, the EVEN number, will be good. (That&#8217;s our Trek movie luck, right?)</p>
<p>We can only hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/05/30/well-my-mom-loved-the-new-star-trek-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost: Fade to White</title>
		<link>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/05/14/lost-fade-to-white/</link>
		<comments>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/05/14/lost-fade-to-white/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closetscifigeek.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hopefully Lost won&#8217;t end in the same semi-lame-o way BSG did &#8211; but so far, so good, this season&#8217;s cliffhanger was a doozy. (SPOILER ALERT! Don&#8217;t read anything else if you haven&#8217;t seen the latest episide!) A couple of random thoughts: First off, I don&#8217;t get why people are questioning whether Juliet set off the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully Lost won&#8217;t end in the same semi-lame-o way BSG did &#8211; but so far, so good, this season&#8217;s cliffhanger was a doozy. (<strong>SPOILER ALERT! Don&#8217;t read anything else if you haven&#8217;t seen the latest episide!)</strong></p>
<p>A couple of random thoughts: First off, I don&#8217;t get why people are questioning whether Juliet set off the bomb at the end of the episode. Of course she did! The question is: What will happen to our favorite Losties once a nuclear explosion comes in contact with a huge pocket of electro-magnetic radiation? My guess: More time travel!</p>
<p>One thing I have not seen on the Lost boards, surprisingly, is any commentary on the radiation suits Desmond and whats-his-face who used to be on Earth 2 and Carnivale had to put on whenever leaving the hatch. The &#8220;sickness&#8221; was the radiation poisoning&#8230;right? The question then remains, how was this cleared out so quickly by the time 2004 came around?</p>
<p>OK&#8230;so the big question is, who is this Jacob guy and what is his relation to the man in black? (Mr. Baddie, which some are referring to as &#8220;Esau&#8221; per the Biblical reference?)</p>
<p>I do think Jacob is a good guy. A semi-manipulative good guy, bringing people to the island to see if they can overcome their baser instincts. Mr. Baddie is the devil, the tempter, who we think now is somehow related to the black smoke.</p>
<p>Well, well, this is starting to get metaphysical. Let&#8217;s back up for a moment and return to the nuclear bomb:</p>
<p>Do our friends survive it? I am going to guess yes. Our big clue was the close up of the eye opening up at the end of the next season promo. That&#8217;s Jack, waking up in the forest, in the same spot, only now he&#8217;s been transported to 2007. He is part of the group that Jacob referred to when he said &#8220;they&#8217;re coming.&#8221;</p>
<p>All the other time travelers &#8211; Sawyer, Juliet, Sayid, Miles, Jin, and Hurley, will also be reappearing in 2007. </p>
<p>However, with Jacob dead, and Mr. Baddie aka Bad Locke running the island, you can be assured that all hell is going to break loose.</p>
<p>Somehow in all this, we&#8217;ll have a flashblack to show us how the Black Rock got stuck in the island, where Richard comes from, and all that other hoo-ha.</p>
<p>Will we be flashing forward to 2012 and the end of the world? It remains to be seen. But given how tightly the story is coming together, I&#8217;m going to guess that however this wraps up, it&#8217;s going to be good. </p>
<p>If we&#8217;re lucky, maybe the vanishing Starbuck will reappear as the &#8220;harbinger of death.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can I wait a year to see how this all resolves? It&#8217;s going to be a long year, that&#8217;s all I&#8217;m gonna say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closetscifigeek.com/2009/05/14/lost-fade-to-white/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

